This
    is a contribution from members of THINCS,  
    The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics 
      
    Home
     
     
    
    Letter
    to Journal of the American College of Cardiology; sent on December 21, 2009 
    
     
    
    
    
    
    Inflammation
    in atherosclerosis. Roles of microbes and the lipoprotein immune system
    
     
    
    Ravnskov U,
    McCully Kilmer S. 
     
    In their review concerning the role of inflammation in atherosclerosis1 
    Libby et al did not discuss the anti-infectious role of lipoproteins. 
    Although extensively documented for many years, the function of the
    lipoproteins in binding and inactivating bacteria, viruses, protozoans and
    their toxins and participating in innate immunity is not widely appreciated.2  
    
     
    The
    involvement of micro-organisms in some way in creation of atherosclerotic
    inflammation seems obvious.  For
    instance, remnants of more than 50 different bacteria and viruses have been
    identified in atherosclerotic plaques, but not a single one in healthy
    arteries.3,4   This
    role of microorganisms has been discussed in more than a hundred reviews,
    but most authors regard their presence as a secondary phenomenon. Obviously
    they have been unaware of the anti-infectious role of the lipoproteins. A
    number of observations indicate that micro-organisms may have a more central
    role in atherogenesis and that lipoproteins may be protective. 
    For instance, low total- and LDL-cholesterol are associated with
    increased morbidity and mortality from infectious diseases.5 
     Cardiovascular mortality increases during influenza epidemics.6  
    The coronary arteries in children who have died from an
    infectious disease are narrowed,7 and the intimal-media thckness
    is thickened in children who survive,8 and eradication of
    periodontal infections improved angiographic changes more than ever obtained
    in a cholesterol lowering trial.9   Unique lipids from a common periodontal infection
    have been found to enhance autoimmunity through interaction with the
    toll-like receptor,10   and
    autoimmunity is  a
    prominent feature of the atherosclerotic process.
    
     
    If
    inflammation itself is the cause of atherosclerosis, treatment with
    anti-inflammatory drugs should be beneficial, but, as the authors mention,
    this has not been the case.  On
    the contrary, such treatment increases cardiovascular mortality.11   
    
     
    Altogether
    these observations and experiments suggest that microbes participate in the
    primary process of atherogenesis.  We
    have recently presented a hypothesis 2  explaining
    many observations that are difficult to explain by the current view.  In summary, we propose that aggregates, formed by complexes
    of lipoproteins, micro-organisms, anti-oxLDL antibodies and
    homocysteinylated LDL, obstruct arterial vasa
    vasorum  because of the high
    extracapillary pressure and because of endothelial dysfunction within these
    vessels.12  This
    obstruction may cause local ischemia, hypoxia and infection of the arterial
    wall, resulting in the formation of a microabscess, the vulnerable plaque.  This hypothesis explains why the temperature of the
    vulnerable plaque is higher than surrounding arterial wall,13 
    why bacteriemia may be present in cardiogenic shock,14 
    and why the symptoms and laboratory findings in acute
    myocardial infarction are similar to those seen in most infectious diseases. 
    
     
    References
    
     
    1.  
    Libby P, Ridker PM, Hansson GK. 
    Inflammation in atherosclerosis. 
    From pathophysiology to practice. 
    J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:2129-2138.
    
     
    2.  
    Ravnskov U, McCully KS.  Review
    and hypothesis:  Vulnerable
    plaque formation from obstruction of vasa
    vasorum by homocysteinylated and oxidized lipoprotein aggregates
    complexed with microbial remnants and LDL autoantibodies. 
    Ann Clin Lab Sci 2009;39:3-16.
    
     
    3.  
    Ott
    SJ, El Mokhtari NE, Musfeldt M et al.  Detection
    of diverse bacterial signatures in atherosclerotic lesions of patients with
    coronary heart disease.  Circulation
    2006;113:292-937.
    
     
    4.  
    Shi Y, Tokunaga O.  Chlamydia pneumoniae  and
    multiple infections in the aorta contribute to atherosclerosis. 
    Pathol Int 2002;52:755-763.
    
     
    5.  
    Ravnskov
    U.  High cholesterol may protect
    against infections and atherosclerosis. 
    Q
    J Med 2003;96:927-934.
    
     
    6.  
    Smeeth
    L, Thomas SL, Hall AJ et al.  Risk
    of myocardial infarction and stroke after acute infection or vaccination. 
    N
    Engl J Med 2004;351:2611-2618.
    
     
    7.  
    Pesonen E. Infection and intimal thickening: evidence from coronary
    arteries in children. Eur Heart J 1994;15 Suppl C:57-61.
    
     
    8.  
    Liuba P, Persson J, Luoma J, Yla-Herttuala S, Pesonen E. Acute
    infections in children are accompanied by oxidative modification of LDL and
    decrease of HDL cholesterol, and are followed by thickening of carotid
    intima-media. Eur Heart J 2003;24:515-21.
    
     
    9.  
    Nichols FC, Housley WJ, O’Conor CA et al. 
    Unique lipids from a common human bacterium represent a new class of
    toll-like receptor 2 ligands capable of enhancing autoimmunity. 
    Am J Pathol 2009;175:2430-2438.
    
     
    10. 
    Piconi S, Trabattoni D, Luragli C et al. 
    Treatment of periodontal disease results in improvements in
    endothelial dysfunction and reduction of the carotid intima-media thickness. 
    FASEB J 2009;23:1196-1204.
    
     
    11. 
    Johnsen SP, Larsson H, Tarone RE et al. 
    Risk of myocardial infarction among users of rofecoxib, celecoxib,
    and other NSAIDS:  a
    population-based case-control study.  Arch
    Intern Med 2005;165:978-984.
    
     
    12. 
    McCully KS.  Chemical
    Pathology of Homocysteine IV.  Excitotoxicity,
    oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, and inflammation. 
    Ann Clin Lab Sci 2009;39:219-232.
    
     
    13. 
    Madjid M, Naghavi M, Malik BA et al. 
    Thermal detection of vulnerable plaque. 
    Am J Cardiol 2002;90:36L-39L.
    
     
    14. 
    Kohsaka S, Menon V, Lowe AM et al. 
    Systemic inflammatory response syndrome after acute myocardial
    infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. 
    Arch Intern Med 2005;165:1643-1650.
    
     
      
    
     
    The
    above letter was rejected. Here is the answer from the editor: 
    5
    January 20101 
    Dear
    Dr. Ravnskov: 
     
    The editors have discussed your Letter to the Editor at their weekly meeting.
    Regrettably, the consensus is that it does not achieve a priority high
    enough to warrant publication. Because of space limitations, we are able to
    publish only a few letters addressing controversial topics. 
     
    Thank you for your interest in the journal. 
     
    Sincerely, 
     
    Anthony N. DeMaria, M.D. 
    Editor-in-Chief 
    Journal of the American College of Cardiology 
      
     
 Other unpublished contributions 
     
              Home  
    
  
  |